Difference between revisions of "Talk:Napoli"

From Hitchwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*I think we should let the '''wikitravel like''' content in the article! it is no spam and you might interessted in it. --[[User:Quarim|Quarim]] 15:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
+
I think we should let the '''wikitravel like''' content in the article! it is no spam and you might interessted in it. --[[User:Quarim|Quarim]] 15:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 +
: Hmm, difficult. I'd say some basics about a city can be find, but shouldn't be too much to avoid being redundant. We are not a travel guide. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 +
: Sightseeing tips and museums don't belong here. They have nothing to do with hitchhiking. If a person has decided to hitchhike through a place, he has likely already read elsewhere about what it has to offer.[[User:CRCulver|CRCulver]] 21:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 +
::okay, i agree --[[User:Quarim|Quarim]] 07:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:31, 28 July 2010

I think we should let the wikitravel like content in the article! it is no spam and you might interessted in it. --Quarim 15:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, difficult. I'd say some basics about a city can be find, but shouldn't be too much to avoid being redundant. We are not a travel guide. --MrTweek 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Sightseeing tips and museums don't belong here. They have nothing to do with hitchhiking. If a person has decided to hitchhike through a place, he has likely already read elsewhere about what it has to offer.CRCulver 21:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
okay, i agree --Quarim 07:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)